![]() |
![]() |
|||
|
The Growing Prohibitionist Threat
The slow, silent march to alcohol prohibition continues apace. In March, Mothers Against Drunk Driving called for a "mandatory provision in every separation agreement and divorce decree that prohibits either parent from drinking and driving … with children under the age of 16 in the vehicle." Any drinking before driving, MADD insisted, should result in penalties that "should include, but are not limited to"– "incarceration," "change of primary custody," or "termination of parental rights."As with all their efforts in recent years, MADD's assault on divorced parents isn't about traffic safety; it's about marginalizing and eventually criminalizing any drinking before driving-one subgroup at a time. For example, they advocate a nationwide arrest threshold of 0.05% BAC for repeat offenders with kids in the car. MADD is literally seeking to redefine the term "drunk" for certain populations-yet another incremental step toward de facto prohibition. It's no coincidence that MADD's 0.05% proposal is identical to a recently passed Utah law written by George Van Komen, who opposes all alcohol consumption. Van Komen leads an organization formerly called the "Anti-Saloon League" and the "National Temperance League." Other examples of neo-prohibitionist "small steps" from 2004 alone include:
|
View Our Study
The American Beverage Licensees has a campaign to expose the neo-prohibitionist agenda. Click on the links above to find out who wants to
restrict your consumption of adult beverages.
For more information or to schedule an interview, contact us at (202) 463-7100 |
|||