<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>American Beverage Institute &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abionline.org/blog/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abionline.org/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:43:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are sobriety checkpoints effective?</title>
		<link>http://abionline.org/blog/2010/02/19/are-sobriety-checkpoints-effective/</link>
		<comments>http://abionline.org/blog/2010/02/19/are-sobriety-checkpoints-effective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ABI</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abionline.org/blog/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night, the ABC-affiliate in Palm Springs, KESQ, ran an investigative report on the effectiveness and cost of DUI checkpoints. The American Beverage Institute is interviewed in the piece:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night, the ABC-affiliate in Palm Springs, <a href="http://www.kesq.com/Global/story.asp?S=12009561">KESQ</a>, ran an investigative report on the effectiveness and cost of DUI checkpoints. The American Beverage Institute is interviewed in the piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://abionline.org/blog/2010/02/19/are-sobriety-checkpoints-effective/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://abionline.org/blog/2010/02/19/are-sobriety-checkpoints-effective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Assemblyman says &#8216;I&#8217;ll be back&#8217; to tax your drinks</title>
		<link>http://abionline.org/blog/2010/01/07/california-assemblyman-says-ill-be-back-to-tax-your-drinks/</link>
		<comments>http://abionline.org/blog/2010/01/07/california-assemblyman-says-ill-be-back-to-tax-your-drinks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ABI</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abionline.org/blog/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the California legislature soundly rejected a nickel-per-drink alcohol tax increase last year and the Assembly Health Committee twice voted down a dime-per-drink tax hike “fee,” you would think that the anti-alcohol legislators introducing these proposals would get the message. Not so for Assemblyman Jim Beall (D-San Jose). Despite his best efforts – and coordination [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the California legislature soundly <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=14&amp;entry_id=36219">rejected a nickel-per-drink</a> alcohol tax increase last year and the Assembly Health Committee twice voted down a dime-per-drink <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">tax hike </span>“fee,” you would think that the anti-alcohol legislators introducing these proposals would get the message. Not so for Assemblyman Jim Beall (D-San Jose).</p>
<p>Despite his best efforts – and coordination with the notoriously <a href="../2009/10/30/taxing-logic-by-the-anti-alcohol-lobby/">anti-alcohol Marin Institute</a> – Beall’s 10-cents-per-drink <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">tax increase </span>“fee,” failed for a second time in committee yesterday. But, the eager Assemblyman <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_14129916?nclick_check=1">says he’ll be back</a> soon with another tax hike proposal:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>“I’m going to wipe it off and come back in a few weeks with something different.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Not only is right now a terrible time to raise taxes as Americans struggle with financial concerns and unemployment, but <a href="http://nodrinktax.com/tax-facts/">alcohol tax increases</a> always hurt businesses, negatively impact the poorest among us, and kill jobs in the hospitality industry.</p>
<p>The hospitality industry isn’t alone in opposition toward the alcohol “fee.” Check out this video we came across of some pretty angry college students confronting Beall:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nFqFMMKLMkc&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nFqFMMKLMkc&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>Our advice to Beall: Realize that California doesn’t want an <a href="../../news_detail.cfm?id=555">alcohol “fee,” tax increase, or whatever else</a> you call it. Don’t come back in a few weeks with the something cut from the same cloth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://abionline.org/blog/2010/01/07/california-assemblyman-says-ill-be-back-to-tax-your-drinks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First, interlocks for all drunk drivers. Next, everyone else.</title>
		<link>http://abionline.org/blog/2009/11/02/first-interlocks-for-all-drunk-drivers-next-everyone-else/</link>
		<comments>http://abionline.org/blog/2009/11/02/first-interlocks-for-all-drunk-drivers-next-everyone-else/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ABI</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abionline.org/blog/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s funny how quickly activists go from wanting to mandate interlocks for drunk drivers to trying to require them for the rest of us.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A letter to the editor in today’s <em><a href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/readersrespond/bal-interlockletter1102b,0,7530211.story">Baltimore Sun</a></em> began by discussing a bill that would require ignition interlocks for all drunk drivers. By the end of the letter, writer Jon Miller called for ignition-locking breathalyzers to be installed in all cars:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Those devices should be standard equipment on every car on the road.</em></p>
<p><em>…I&#8217;m sure the people that don&#8217;t drink would be more than happy to have a device on their car even if they don&#8217;t need to use it.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>It’s funny how quickly activists go from wanting to mandate interlocks for drunk drivers to trying to require them for the rest of us.</p>
<p>We’ve argued for a long time that the campaign for interlock mandates for drunk drivers is just the first step toward getting them in all cars. Check out <a href="http://interlockfacts.com/interlocks-in-all-cars/government/">our interlock timeline</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://abionline.org/blog/2009/11/02/first-interlocks-for-all-drunk-drivers-next-everyone-else/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

